CONCEPT REVIEW:
Tom Ruegg (Owner) and son Brian Ruegg - 8 Village Road, Block 17, Lot 60 (Historic District: New Vernon)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIONS:
Arshad Zakaria (Owner), 1 Spring Hollow Lane, Block 47, Lot 37, ( Not in a Historic District/Not an Independent Contributing Site)
PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION:
Morris/Post & Rail Partners (Owners) 48-52 Red Gate Road, Block 4, Lot 11-12, Historic District: Silver Lake
CONCEPT REVIEW:
Mr. Ruegg, the current owner, wishes to build a second floor addition over the existing kitchen addition, thereby tying in to an upstairs bedroom and enlarging a closet, as well as adding a 20 x 25 ft garage which will be connected to the original house by a new breezeway. The owner stated that the original siding is wood clapboard (currently covered by aluminum) and they plan to use wood in the new construction with a probable asphalt roof. The owner stated a desire to reconstruct a previously removed front porch that extended across the length of the house. The HPC advised that they would be supportive of restoring the porch as original.
The owner also proposes to install an 8 ft x 40 ft storage container on the property to temporarily hold tools during construction. Mr. Ruegg mentioned that the Township prefers a timeline for construction equipment.
The owner discussed a subsequent phase that would involve the construction of a +/-30 ft x 40 ft detached workshop with residential apartment above. The commission suggested that the owner consider the entire site development (i.e., new road access, possibly septic work) at the out-set of the project to ensure compatible viability of the various building and site components. The Commission further commented on the positive impact created by detached accessory structures and the contribution that they make to the scale of the village setting. The Commission also suggested that the workshop appearance be consistent with barn structures within the relative vicinity. Commission members expressed concern that the inclusion of dormers will detract from the simplicity of a barn structure.
The owner explained the development of a new access drive. The commission offered advice as to the myriad of approvals that may be required in order to achieve the desired site development. The Commission agrees that the overall impression of the lot will depend on where the driveway will be. The Commission suggested that the owner get a civil engineer involved regarding septic system and Township’s zoning ordinances, such as lot coverage amounts.
Generally, the Historic Preservation Commission feels this is a positive direction for this property. This is a contributing structure in the New Vernon Historic District.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIONS:
PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION:
OLD BUSINESS:
Continued Discussion of Harding Township School’s proposed roof repairs and possibility of replacing 165 corbels along the roof of the original school building. D. Denson and D. Maselli looked into the merits and estimated cost of the approximately $10,000 project. D. Denson wondered if local groups might be interested in helping cover the costs of the project and perhaps the Commission could approach the New Vernon Historical Society to see if there was any interest in holding a fundraiser for this effort. Members of the HPC will approach the Historical Society and report results at the next meeting.
Camaratta, 35 Pleasantville Road Dave Denson took a tour of the house on Pleasantville Road during the Board of Adjustment’s site inspection. The damaged house is proposed for demolition; Dave found nothing worth saving of historic note.
The Commission congratulated D. Maselli upon hearing of his selection as the subject of an article to be published in Park Place magazine. Dan mentioned that he would be speaking about why he chose to live in Harding, so the Commission happily suggested the inclusion of such terms as “rural and historic Harding,” “streetscape,” etc....wherever possible during the interview process.